Oscar Munoz v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
| Oscar Munoz |
| T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA Inc |
| 4:2023cv00371 |
| June 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Brian C Wimes |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Central; Case Number 2:23-cv-00766. |
| Filing 17 Transfer Order from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 3073, transferring case to USDC, United States District Court, Western District of Missouri and assigned to Honorable Honorable Brian C. Wimes. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (yl) [Transferred from cacd on 6/7/2023.] |
| Filing 16 STATUS REPORT (JOINT) Regarding Motion to Transfer filed by Defendants T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile, USA Inc.. (Jones, Deborah) [Transferred from cacd on 6/7/2023.] |
| Filing 15 STATUS REPORT Regarding Motion to Transfer (Joint) filed by Defendants T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile, USA Inc.. (Jones, Deborah) [Transferred from cacd on 6/7/2023.] |
Filing 14
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PENDING THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATIONS RULING ON THE PENDING MOTION TO TRANSFER (DKT. #13 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. the Stipulation is APPROVED. This matter is stayed pending the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's ruling on the pending Motion to Transfer in In re: T Mobile 2022 Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig., MDL No. 3073. Should the Motion to Transfer be denied, T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc.s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended for a total of 30 days after the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issues a ruling on the pending Motion to Transfer. The parties shall provide reports on the status of the Motion to Transfer on the earlier of every 30 days or within seven days of a ruling on the Motion to Transfer. The first such status report shall be filed on or before April 17, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) [Transferred from cacd on 6/7/2023.]
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending The Judicial Panel On Multidistrict Litigation's Ruling On The Pending Motion To Transfer filed by Defendants T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile, USA Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation To Stay Case Pending The Judicial Panel On Multidistrict Litigation's Ruling On the Pending Motion To Transfer)(Attorney Lisa L. Garcia added to party T-Mobile US, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Lisa L. Garcia added to party T-Mobile, USA Inc.(pty:dft))(Garcia, Lisa) [Transferred from cacd on 6/7/2023.] |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant T-Mobile, USA Inc. (yl) [Transferred from cacd on 6/7/2023.] |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant T-Mobile US, Inc. (yl) [Transferred from cacd on 6/7/2023.] |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Oscar Munoz. (Audet, William) [Transferred from cacd on 6/7/2023.] |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Oscar Munoz. (Audet, William) [Transferred from cacd on 6/7/2023.] |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj) [Transferred from cacd on 6/7/2023.]
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:23-cv-00477 JAK(PLAx). Case transferred from Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg to Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:23-cv-00766 JAK(PLAx). Signed by Judge John A. Kronstadt (rn) [Transferred from cacd on 6/7/2023.]
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) [Transferred from cacd on 6/7/2023.] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) [Transferred from cacd on 6/7/2023.] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (car) [Transferred from cacd on 6/7/2023.] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Oscar Munoz, (Audet, William) [Transferred from cacd on 6/7/2023.] |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Oscar Munoz. (Audet, William) [Transferred from cacd on 6/7/2023.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34723845 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Oscar Munoz. (Attorney William M Audet added to party Oscar Munoz(pty:pla))(Audet, William) [Transferred from cacd on 6/7/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
