Armstrong v. Ward et al
| Christopher C. Armstrong |
| Christina Ward, Scott Westlacht and Robert Shively |
| 4:2023cv00703 |
| October 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Fernando J Gaitan |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This case is summarily dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 5
ORDERED that this case is summarily dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Signed on 11/27/2023 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 4 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Arkansas Eastern; Case Number 4:22-cv-01290. |
|
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Clerk to transfer immediately Mr. Armstrong's entire case file to the U.S. District Court Western District of Missouri. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/28/2023. (jak) [Transferred from ared on 10/3/2023.]
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights against All Defendants, filed by Christopher C Armstrong. (jbh) [Transferred from ared on 10/3/2023.] |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher C Armstrong. (jbh) [Transferred from ared on 10/3/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
