Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Armstrong v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00703
Plaintiff:
Christopher C. Armstrong
Defendant:
Christina Ward, Scott Westlacht and Robert Shively
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Armstrong v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Christopher C. Armstrong
Defendant:
Christina Ward, Scott Westlacht and Robert Shively
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Christopher C. Armstrong
Defendant:
Christina Ward, Scott Westlacht and Robert Shively
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Christopher C. Armstrong
Defendant:
Christina Ward, Scott Westlacht and Robert Shively
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Ward et al
as 4:2022cv01290
Plaintiff:
Christopher C Armstrong
Defendant:
Christina Ward, Scott Westlacht and Robert Shively
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
WARD v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv05247
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA WARD
Defendant:
LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMERICAN REGENT, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jaco v. Mullins et al
as 4:2021cv00506
Plaintiff:
Cathryn Jaco
Defendant:
Lindi Mullins, Christina Ward, Scott Weelosh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARD v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv05083
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA WARD
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Feven Belay v. Maurice Starr et al
as 2:2016cv08583
Plaintiff:
Feven Belay
Defendant:
Does, Maurice Starr, Tarran Starr and others
Ward v. Hamblen County et al
as 2:2012cv00385
Plaintiff:
Christina Ward
Defendant:
Hamblen County, Tennessee, Esco Jarnagin, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
