Williams v. Castillo
Petitioner: Robert W. Williams
Respondent: Juan Castillo
Case Number: 6:2012cv03067
Filed: February 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Springfield Office
County: Greene
Presiding Judge: Richard E. Dorr
Presiding Judge: James C. England
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER adopting 13 Report and Recommendations; denying petition for writ of habeas corpus. Copy sent to petitioner via first class mail.(Schroeppel, Kerry).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Castillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert W. Williams
Represented By: David R. Mercer
Represented By: Michelle M. Law
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Juan Castillo
Represented By: Earl W. Brown, III
Represented By: Cynthia J. Hyde
Represented By: Christina Leigh Wiggins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?