Stenson v. Arnott
| Kwaim Allen Stenson |
| Jim Arnott |
| 6:2020cv03031 |
| January 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Bough |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This is case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Courts orders. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 9
ORDER: ORDERED that this is case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's orders. Any motion to reopen must be filed within a reasonable time and must comply with the Court's previous orders. Signed on 03/11/2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Willis, Kathy)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff must show cause, on or before March 6, 2020, why his case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed on 02/21/2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 7 PLAINTIFF'S LETTER to the Court filed by Kwaim Allen Stenson. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit) (Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause, on or before March 28, 2020, why this action should not be dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to comply with this Court's order and for failure to prosecute. Signed on February 19, 2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Davies, Cindy)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) the Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff another set of civil rights forms for his use in filing an amended complaint; (2) Plaintiff is directed to pay an initial partial filing fee of $69.19 and to file a single superseding amended complaint, as specifically discussed herein, on or before February 14, 2020; and (3) Plaintiffs failure to pay his initial partial filing fee and file an amended complaint as set forth herein will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 01/31/2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. CLERK'S NOTE: Set of civil rights forms along with a copy of this Order were mailed to Plaintiff as directed. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 4 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Kwaim Allen Stenson. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Kwaim Allen Stenson. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sheriff Jim Arnott filed by Kwaim Allen Stenson. (Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stenson v. Arnott | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jim Arnott | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kwaim Allen Stenson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
