Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Taylor a/k/a McCartney v. Arnott
as 6:2024cv03168
Petitioner:
Taylor a/k/a Nigel S McCartney
Respondent:
Jim Arnott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montano v. Greene County Jail, et al
as 6:2024cv03120
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Montano
Defendant:
Greene County Jail and Jim Arnott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCartney v. Arnott
as 24-4001
Petitioner:
TAYLOR, FKA Gary Taylor Kruitbosch, AKA Nigel Snookeroo McCartney
Respondent:
JIM ARNOTT
Porter v. King et al
as 6:2023cv03395
Plaintiff:
Anthony Porter
Defendant:
M King, VerPloeg, M Tizen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sykes v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2023cv03313
Plaintiff:
Martin T Sykes and Martin J Sykes
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Greene County Jail, Greene County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bailey v. Arnott
as 6:2022cv03264
Petitioner:
Bradley Eugene Bailey
Respondent:
Jim Arnott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinnie v. Greene County Sheriff Department et al
as 6:2022cv03224
Plaintiff:
Kayvon D McKinnie
Defendant:
Greene County Sheriff Department, Jim Arnott and Polodna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnott et al v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc.
as 6:2022cv03193
Plaintiff:
Jim Arnott and Greene County, Missouri
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
McCartney v. Arnott
as 1:2022cv00072
Petitioner:
Nigel S. McCartney, Taylor, Nigel Snookeroo McCartney and others
Respondent:
Jim Arnott
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Arnott
as 6:2022cv03112
Petitioner:
Taylor
Respondent:
Jim Arnott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
