Cox v. General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems et al
| Phillip Cox |
| General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, General Dynamics Aerospace, General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products, General Dynamics Combat Systems and General Dynamics Marine Systems |
| Phillip Cox |
| United States of America |
| 4:2007cv03264 |
| January 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The defendant's motion to dismiss 58 is granted. Final judgment will be entered by separate document providing that the action is dismissed with prejudice as to the relator but without prejudice as to the United States of America. The relator's request for leave to amend is denied. The defendant's request for attorney fees is denied. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAE)
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - At the Court's request a telephonic hearing on the Motion for Extension of Time in which to file the Report of Parties' Rule 26(f) Planning Conference (Filing No. 65 ) is set for Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 3:30 P.M. Counsel for the defendant shall arrange for the conference call and contact the participants with the necessary information to enterthe call.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (TCL )
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 5/17/2010. If a planning conference is needed, the parties shall contact chambers by 5/10/2010 to arrange a conference call. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAE)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion to Continue. The plaintiffs amended complaint shall be filed on or before February 3, 2010. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Counts 2 and 3 of the plaintiffs' complaint are deemed withdrawn and are dismissed without prejudice. A final judgment will be entered by separate document dismissing counts 2 and 3 without prejudice, and dismissing Philli p Cox as a party plaintiff in his individual capacity. The defendant's motion to dismiss (filing 38 ) is granted in part and denied in part: a. The defendant's Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is denied. b. The defendant's Rule 9(b) motion is granted, and the plaintiff shall be required to file an amended complaint that fully satisfies the pleading requirements of Rule 9(b) by January 29, 2010. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER - The parties' joint motion to continue, (filing no. 42 ), is granted, and the parties' Rule 26(f) Report of Parties Planning Conference shall be filed on or before thirty (30) days after the court rules on the defendant's pending motion to dismiss. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER granting 40 Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time. Plaintiff shall have until October 28, 2009, to respond to Defendant's motion to dismiss (filing 38 ). Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The plaintiff's motion to dismiss (filing 32 ) is granted, and that judgment shall be entered by separate document in accordance with this memorandum and order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER - The seal be lifted on the complaint and served upon the defendant by the relator; all other contents of the Court's file in this action remain under seal and not be made public or served upon the defendant, except for this Order and The Government's Notice of Election to Decline Intervention, which the relator will serve upon the defendant only after service of complaint; the seal be lifted as to all other matters occuring in this action after the date of this Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LKH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
