Cases 1 - 8 of 8
WOOD v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN S. WOOD
Defendant:
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, GENERAL DYNAMICS ADVANCED INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., GENERAL DYNAMICS ADVANCED TECHONOLOGY SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv30253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Cox v. General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems et al
as 4:2007cv03264
Plaintiff:
Phillip Cox
Relator Plaintiff:
Phillip Cox
Defendant:
General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, General Dynamics Aerospace, General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
WOOD v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2009cv00974
Defendant:
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, GENERAL DYNAMICS ADVANCED INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., GENERAL DYNAMICS SALARIED RETIREMENT PLAN - ATS LEGACY DIVISIONS and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN S. WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
WOOD v. GENERAL DYNAMICS ADVANCED INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2008cv00624
Defendant:
GENERAL DYNAMICS ADVANCED INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN S. WOOD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Cox v. General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, et al
as 4:2007cv03168
Plaintiff:
Phillip Cox
Defendant:
Defense Contract Managment Agency, Rebecca N. Seeger, General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
