Bates v. Astrue
| Cheryl Bates |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| 4:2008cv03118 |
| June 3, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office |
| Hall |
| Warren K. Urbom |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 42:402 Social Security Benefits |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER on Plaintiff's Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Plaintiff's application for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, filing 33 , is granted, and the plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $3832.00. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON REVIEW OF THE FINAL DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. Now before me is Plaintiff Cheryl Bates' complaint, filing 1 , which is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3). The plaint iff seeks a review of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's decision to deny the plaintiff's application Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381 et seq.1 The defendant has filed an answer to the complaint and a transcript of the administrative record. (See filings 16 , 19 .) In addition, the parties have filed briefs in support of their respective positions. (See Pl.'s Br., filing 25 ; Def.'s Br., filing 30 .) I have carefully reviewed these materials, and I find that the case must be remanded for further proceedings. IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security's decision is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the memorandum accompanying this order. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (LKH)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting 28 Defendant's Second Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaitniff's Brief. ORDER setting briefing schedule. 20 The defendant's brief deadline is extended to April 13, 2009; within one week after the defendan t's answer brief is filed, the plaintiff may file a reply brief and either party may request oral argument or make any other request which may be permitted under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and in the absence of an order setting the case for oral argument or scheduling further proceedings, the case shall be deemed to be submitted at the expiration of the time period specified in paragraph 3 hereof. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (EJL)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting 26 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Brief Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Brief 25 26 , ORDER setting briefing schedule. 20 The defendant shall have on or before March 13, 2009, in which to fil e and serve its responsive brief, and within one week after the defendant's answer brief is filed, the plaintiff may file a reply brief and either party may request oral argument or make any other request which may be permitted under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (EJL)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 23 Motion of Extension of time. The plaintiff's brief shall be due on or before January 7, 2009, regarding ORDER setting briefing schedule. 20 Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (EJL)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting 21 Plaintiff's Motion of Extension of Time Plaintiff's Initial Brief 21 . The plaintiff will have until and including the 23rd day of December, 2008, to file her brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (EJL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bates v. Astrue | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cheryl Bates | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas D. Purifoy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
