Fiedler v. State of Nebraska Department of Roads et al
| Eugene J. Fiedler |
| State of Nebraska Department of Roads, Nebraska Association of Public Employees, Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission, Ombudsman, Moe Jamshidi, Laird Weishahn, Ron Bohling, Carolyn Mattice, Diane Holthus, Michael Mitchell, Dan Nichols, Linda Masek, George Woolsrum, Robert Rea, John Craig, David Hall, Wayne Teton, Monty Fredrickson, William J. Wood, Joseph Kuehn, Jordan Larson, Omar Qudus, Bruce Trautwein, Ted Buri and Michael Marvin |
| 4:2008cv03144 |
| July 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Saunders |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
156
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 155 Motion to Extend Time. The court will rule on the pending Motion for Summary Judgment in its normal course. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (JSF)
|
|
Filing
154
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 152 Motion to Extend. Plaintiff shall have until November 1, 2011, to file a response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' Objection 153 is denied. The court will not grant Plaintiff any additional extension of time to filed a response to the pending Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(ADB)
|
|
Filing
146
ORDER that this matter is before the court following a telephone conference with the parties on May 5, 2011. IT IS ORDERED: The plaintiff shall have until May 31, 2011, in which to file a response to the defendants MOTION for Summary Judgment 144 . The defendants shall have ten business days thereafter to file a reply. The deadlines and trial setting in the December 7, 2010, progression order (Filing No. 133) are canceled and will be established by the court following resolution of the defenda nts' motion for summary judgment. The Clerk of Court shall reassign this case to the pro se docket in accordance with General Order No. 2007-13. The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this order to the plaintiff at: Eugene J. Fiedler, 2450 County Road F, Weston, NE 68070. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (copy mailed as directed)(ADB, )
|
|
Filing
142
ORDER- Joy Shiffermillers motion to withdraw (Filing No. 135 ) is granted. Eugene J. Fiedler is hereby considered proceeding pro se and counsel for the defendants may communicate with him directly regarding this case. Mr. Fiedler may have new coun sel appear on his behalf at any time. The plaintiffs request (Filing No. 141 ) for an extension of the deadline to file motions to compel discovery until May 5, 2011, is granted. The court will hold a conference with the parties for the purpose of assessing the current progression order and scheduling this matter to trial. The conference will be held by telephone before the undersigned magistrate judge on Thursday, May 5, 2011, at 11:00 a.m. Counsel for the defendants shall initiate the telep hone conference. Eugene J. Fiedler is required to participate in the scheduling conference. The plaintiff shall notify the court and the defendants counsel of his current telephone number as soon as possible, but in any event no later than April 27, 2011, in writing by filing a notice containing the information with the Clerk of Court. The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this order to the plaintiff at: Eugene J. Fiedler, 2450 County Road F, Weston, NE 68070. ( Planning Conference set for 5/5/2011 at 11:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (Copies mailed as directed)(MKR)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER- Joy Shiffermillers motion to withdraw (Filing No. 135 ) is held in abeyance. Eugene J. Fiedler shall have to on or before April 1, 2011, to respond to the motion to withdraw by filing a brief with the Clerk of Court. If no response is receiv ed or if substitute counsel has entered an appearance by that date, the motion to withdraw will be granted. If the motion to withdraw is granted and substitute counsel has not entered an appearance, Eugene J. Fiedler will be considered proceeding pro se. 3 Moving counsel shall serve a copy of this order on her client and file a certificate of such service with the court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER that this matter is hereby scheduled for a telephone conference regarding the status of the case on December 7, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., Central Standard Time, with the undersigned magistrate judge. Counsel for the plaintiff shall initiate the telephone conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (ADB, )
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER that this case is stayed pending resolution of the defendants' motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity 120 . The parties shall have 10 days from the date the court rules on the pending motion for summary judgment 120 , in which to schedule a telephone planning conference with the court, if necessary. Counsel for the plaintiff shall contact the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge within such time period to schedule the telephone planning conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (JSF)
|
|
Filing
88
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that defendants' motions to dismiss 60 , 62 , 64 , 66 , 68 , 70 , 72 , 74 and 76 are denied at this time as moot. Plaintiff's counsel is ordered to file an amended complaint, within 30 days from the date of this order, that complies with Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 8 and 10, this Memorandum and Order, and the court's previously filed Memorandum and Order dated 9/30/08 8 . Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (JSF)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER OF DISMISSAL granting 16 Motion to Dismiss Party without prejudice as to defendants Nebraska Association of Public Employees (NAPE ASME), Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission, Ombudsman, Dan Nichols, Linda Masek, David Hall, Wayne Teton, William J. Wood, Jordan Larson, Omar Qudus, Bruce Trautwein, Ted Buri (NAPE ASME), and Michael Marvin (NAPE ASME). Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB, )
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's claims for monetary damages under the ADA, ADEA, and FMLA self-care provisions against the Nebraska Department of Roads, the Nebraska Association of Public Employees, and the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commissi on are dismissed. Plaintiff's claims for monetary damages under the FMLA family-care provisions, and Plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief under the ADA and FMLA self-care provisions may proceed against the Nebraska Department of Roads, the Nebraska Association of Public Employees, and the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission. However, no summons will be issued until Plaintiff has an opportunity to amend his Complaint in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Plaintiff shall ha ve until October 30, 2008 to amend his Complaint. No summons will be issued until after Plaintiff has had an opportunity to amend his Complaint in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case man agement deadline in this case using the following text: Check for amended complaint on October 30, 2008. Plaintiff shall keep the court informed of his current address at all times while this case is pending. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAE, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
