Jordan v. Astrue
| Robin R Jordan |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| 4:2008cv03217 |
| October 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office |
| Lancaster |
| David L. Piester |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 42:0405 Review of HHS Decision |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The plaintiff's appeal is taken in good faith, and the plaintiff is unable to pay the appellate filing and docketing fees. The plaintiff's motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis, (filing no. 32 ), is granted, and his prior IFP motion, (filing no. 28 ), is denied as moot. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding: Notice of Appeal to USCA, 25 filed by Robin R. Jordan and MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis 28 filed by Robin R. Jordan. On or before February 2, 2010, the plaintiff shall either file a new Application t o Proceed IFP or pay the appellate filing and docketing fee of $455.00. If plaintiff fails to timely comply with this memorandum and order, his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied without further notice, and the court of appeals will be advised accordingly. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Upon review of the record as a whole, the court finds substantial evidence supporting the ALJ's decision. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the findings and conclusions of the ALJ are affirmed. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER granting 17 Motion to Extend briefing schedule regarding Order on Motion to Extend, 15 . the deadline for defendant's brief is extended to May 11, 2009. Plaintiff may file a reply brief by May 26, 2009. The case shall be ripe for decision on June 2, 2009. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting 14 Motion to Extend Time regarding ORDER setting briefing schedule 13 . Plaintiff's brief shall be filed by March 9, 2009. Defendant's brief shall be filed by April 9, 2009. Plaintiff may file a reply brief by April 23, 2009, and the case shall be ripe for decision on April 27, 2009. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of the Court shall file the original complaint and the accompanying pleadings without the prepayment of costs or fees. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (JAB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jordan v. Astrue | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robin R Jordan | |
| Represented By: | John B. Milligan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
