Criswell v. Astrue
Plaintiff: William Criswell
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 4:2009cv03010
Filed: January 20, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County: Lancaster
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:416 Denial of Social Security Benefits

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Because the plaintiff's administrative remedies have not been exhausted, the court cannot entertain this action. Accordingly,IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's motion to dismiss (filing 9 ) is granted. Judgment shall be entered by separate document. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Criswell v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Criswell
Represented By: Roger D. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?