Thomas v. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Nichole L. Thomas
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party: Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Case Number: 4:2010cv03250
Filed: December 22, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge: Cheryl R. Zwart
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 54 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees and 59 Defendant's Objection to Plaintiff's Motion. Fees awarded to Plaintiff against Defendant in the amount of $3,831.35. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (BHC)
March 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiffs' motion to amend her complaint, (filing no. 41 ), is denied as futile. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded for further determination of whether Thomas was disabled, for the purposes of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security benefits, from September 26, 2003 to February 29, 2004. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
May 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 CONSENT ORDER that if the parties consent to final disposition of the case by the undersigned magistrate judge, on or before June13, 2011, they shall complete the attached "CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. " After all parties have signed this form, e-mail it in.pdf format to clerk@ned.uscourts.gov. Do not electronically file this form or submit it to chambers. In the absence of timely submitting the attached form in accordance with paragraph (1), the case will be reassigned to a district judge. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (ADB, )
December 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall send a copy of this Memorandum and Order together with 3 summons forms and 3 Form 285 to plaintiff's attorney of record for service of process on the United States. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copies mailed as directed) (JSF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: Robert L. Homan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Represented By: Office of General Counsel Social Security Administ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nichole L. Thomas
Represented By: Stephen L. Speicher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?