Robinson v. Astrue
Tycer Robinson |
Michael J. Astrue |
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
4:2011cv03001 |
January 5, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
4 Lincoln Office |
Lyle E. Strom |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding Complaint 1 filed by Tycer Robinson. Substantial evidence in the record as a whole supports the ALJ's determination that Robinson was not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act due to his material su bstance abuse, and the ALJ's decision complies with the relevant law. The Commissioner's denial of Robinsons SSI benefits claim will be affirmed. A separate order will be entered in accordance with this memorandum opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JAB) |
Filing 18 ORDER granting 17 Defendant's Motion to Extend time to respond to plaintiff's brief. Defendant shall have until July 8, 2011, to submit his brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JAB) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting 14 Plaintiff's Motion to Extend. Plaintiff shall have until May 9, 2011, to submit his brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JAB) |
Filing 4 ORDER - Plaintiff's application 2 for leave to proceed without prepaying fees or costs is granted. This action shall be filed at no cost to plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.