Kellen v. SSA Security
| Kathleen A. Kellen |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
| 4:2011cv03002 |
| January 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the motion for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (Filing No. 32 ) is granted as follows: a. Kellen's attorney is entitled to an attorney fee of $12,507.25 from Kellen's pas t-due benefits. b. The Commissioner shall distribute $12,507.25, the amount withheld to pay Kellen's attorney. c. Kellen's attorney shall immediately refund to Kellen $4,882.50, the full amount previously awarded under the EAJA. d. Kellen and Kellen's attorney shall provide the Commissioner with documentation showing that the prior EAJA award has been refunded. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (TCL )
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 26 Motion for Attorney Fees. Fees awarded to Plaintiff against Defendant. By separate document, the court will enter judgment for Plaintiff and against Defendant providing that Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees of $4,882.50. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (GJG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
