King v. Houston et al
Petitioner: Donnell King
Respondent: Dennis Bakewell and Robert P. Houston
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Case Number: 4:2011cv03067
Filed: May 5, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge: Warren K. Urbom
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Donnell King shall have until March 6, 2012, to file a motion for Certificate of Appealability and brief in support. In the event that King fails to file a motion and brief, as set forth in this Memorandum and Order Regarding Notice of Appeal, the court will deny the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management in this case with the following text: March 6, 2012: check for filing of motion for Certificate of Appealability. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (AOA)
January 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - the Petitioner Donnell King's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 For Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (filing no. 1 ) is denied in all respects and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order on Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (AOA)
December 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- The respondent shall have until January 6, 2012, to file supplemental state court records that contain Kings October 18, 2008, motion for appointment of counsel and any related documents, including, but not limited to, docket sheets and court orders. ( Case Management Deadline set for 1/6/2012.) Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party) (MKR)
August 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Motion for Extension 12 filed by Donnell King is granted. King shall file his brief in response to the respondents brief nolater than 60 days after the respondents file their Supplemental Designation of Records in Support of the Answer. King's Motion for Appointment of Counsel 13 is denied. King's Motion for Leave for Discovery 14 is denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(KBJ)
June 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C.§ 2254 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY - Upon initial review of the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (filing no. [1 ]), the court preliminarily determines that Donnell King's claims, as set forth in this Memorandum and Order on Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody are potentially cognizable in federal cou rt. The clerk of the court is directed to mail copies of this memorandum and order and the petition to the respondents, Robert P. Houston and Dennis Bakewell, and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-class mail. By July 23, 2011, the resp ondents shall file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: July 23, 2011: deadline for respondent s to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. If the respondents elect to file an answer, the following procedures set out in this order shall be followed by the respondents and King. The clerk of the court is di rected to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: August 22, 2011: check for the respondents to file an answer and separate brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party and as Ordered). (GJG)
June 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER provisionally granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Donnell King will not be required to pay the $5.00 fee at this time. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(JAE)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. Houston et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Nebraska Attorney General
Represented By: Jon C. Bruning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dennis Bakewell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert P. Houston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Donnell King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?