Cases 1 - 10 of 24
KING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13724
Plaintiff:
BILLY DONNELL KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Larry King v. M. Biter, et al
as 18-15743
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY DONNELL KING
Defendant / Appellee:
M. D. BITER, Warden, D. TARNOFF, J. ACEBEDO and others
Larry King v. M. Biter, et al
as 18-15743
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY DONNELL KING
Defendant - Appellee:
M. D. BITER, Warden, D. TARNOFF, J. ACEBEDO and others
(PC) King v. Stane et al
as 1:2017cv01660
Defendant:
C. Lesniak, P. Chanelo, M. Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Donnell King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv00221
Plaintiff:
Leonard Donnell King
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Davis et al v. Valsamis, Inc.
as 1:2016cv20517
Defendant:
Valsamis, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leslie Mayberry , Diane Tucker , Ana Santa Ana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Donnell King v. Jon Brunning, et al
as 15-3446
Petitioner - Appellant:
Donnell King, an Inmate at the Nebraska State Penitentiary
Respondent:
Michael Kenney, Director of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Respondent - Appellee:
Jon Brunning, The Attorney General of the State of Nebraska, et al. and Scott Frakes
King v. Biter et al
as 1:2015cv00414
Plaintiff:
Larry Donnell King
Defendant:
M. D. Biter, D. Tarnoff, S. Tallerico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Biter et al
as 2:2014cv02864
Plaintiff:
Larry Donnell King
Defendant:
M. D. Biter, D. Tarnoff, S. Tallerico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Kenney et al
as 8:2014cv00358
Respondent:
Jon Brunning and Michael Kenney
Petitioner:
Donnell King
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
