King v. Kenney et al
Petitioner: Donnell King
Respondent: Jon Brunning and Michael Kenney
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Case Number: 8:2014cv00358
Filed: November 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Laurie Smith Camp
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Petitioner, who proceeded in the district court action in forma pauperis, may now proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. The clerk of court is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
March 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that upon initial review of the habeas corpus petition 1 , the Court preliminarily determines that King's claims are potentially cognizable in federal court. The Clerk's Office is directed to mail copies of this Memora ndum and Order and the habeas corpus petition to Respondents and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-class mail. By May 4, 2015, Respondents must file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The Clerk& #039;s Office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: May 4, 2015: deadline for Respondents to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. The Clerk's Office i s directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: June 3, 2015: check for Respondents' answer and separate brief. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed) (JSF)
November 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. Kenney et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jon Brunning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michael Kenney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Donnell King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Nebraska Attorney General
Represented By: Jon C. Bruning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?