Salih v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Fadil Salim Salih
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party: Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Case Number: 4:2011cv03218
Filed: November 30, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge: Cheryl R. Zwart
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 37 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment. Having evaluated the issues as requested by the plaintiff, the court continues to find that the ALJ's decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. The courts prior judgment will not be altered or amended. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
February 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Complaint. The findings and conclusions of the ALJ are affirmed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (BHC)
April 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - CONSENT ORDER: If the parties consent to final disposition of the case by the undersigned magistrate judge, on or before May 7, 2012, they shall complete the attached "CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITE D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE." After all parties have signed this form, e-mail it in.pdf format to clerk@ned.uscourts.gov. Do not electronically file this form or submit it to chambers. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (DMS)
December 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 3 Motion for Leave and the complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this Memorandum and Order together with three summons forms and three Form 285 to the plaintiff' ;s attorney of record for service of process on the United States. If requested to do so, the United States Marshal shall serve all process in this case without prepayment of fees from the Plaintiff. In making such a request, Plaintiff's counse l must complete the Marshal's Form 285, to be submitted to the Marshal with the completed summons forms and copies of the Complaint. In the absence of those forms, service of process by the Marshal cannot occur. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copies mailed as directed)(ADB, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Salih v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Represented By: Office of General Counsel Social Security Administ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fadil Salim Salih
Represented By: Stephen L. Speicher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?