Adams v. Astrue
| Robert Edward Adams |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
| 4:2012cv03239 |
| December 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Laurie Smith Camp |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON REVIEW OF THE FINAL DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security's decision is affirmed. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (TCL )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: The Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 2 ) is granted, and payment of costs and fees is not required for filing of the appeal. If requested to do so, the U.S. Marshal will serve proc ess in this case without prepayment of fees. In making such a request, Plaintiff's counsel must complete the Marshals Form 285, to be submitted to the Marshal with the completed summons forms and copies of the Complaint. This order is enter ed without prejudice to the Court later entering an order taxing costs in this case. No one, including the Plaintiff, is relieved by this order from the obligation to pay or to reimburse taxable costs after the completion of this action. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (TCL )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
