Friend v. Martin et al
| David E. Friend |
| Todd Martin, The Attorney General of the State of Nebraska and Wyoming Honor Conservation Camp |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 4:2017cv03156 |
| November 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the motion for summary judgment (filing no. 10 ) is granted on the statute of limitations issue. The habeas corpus petition (filing no. 1 ) is denied and dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be issued. No certificate of appealability has been or will be issued. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (CS)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER that Petitioner's Request for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment (filing no. 14 ) is granted. Petitioner's responsive brief shall be filed on or before April 11, 2018. Respondent's reply brief shall be filed on or before May 11, 2018. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER that upon initial review of the Petition (Filing No. 1 ), the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claim is potentially cognizable in federal court. By February 5, 2018, Respondent must file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: February 5, 2018: deadline for Respondent to file state court records in support of ans wer or motion for summary judgment. If Respondent elects to file a motion for summary judgment, the following procedures must be followed by Respondent and Petitioner. If Respondent elects to file an answer, the following procedures must be follow ed by Respondent and Petitioner. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: March 5, 2018: check for Respondent's answer and separate brief. No discovery shall be undertaken without leave of the court. See Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER that the Petitioner is directed to submit the $5.00 fee to the clerk's office or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter without fu rther notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Petitioner the Form AO240 ("Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit"). The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: January 2, 2018: Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
