Cases
Cotney v. Wyoming Honor Conservation Camp & Boot Camp Case Manager et al
as 0:2021cv00175
Defendant: Wyoming Honor Conservation Camp & Boot Camp Case Manager, Wyoming Honor Conservation Camp & Boot Camp Correctional Officer Powers, Aimee Simmons and others
Plaintiff: Phillip DeWayne Cotney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Friend v. Martin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv03156
Petitioner: David E. Friend
Respondent: Todd Martin, The Attorney General of the State of Nebraska and Wyoming Honor Conservation Camp
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herdt v. Wyoming Honor Conservation Camp Warden et al
as 2:2015cv00107
Petitioner: Michael Herdt
Defendant: Wyoming Honor Conservation Camp Warden
Respondent: Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McDonald v. Murphy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-8086
Petitioner - Appellant: DONALD MCDONALD
Respondent - Appellee: MICHAEL MURPHY, Warden, Wyoming Honor Conservation Camp
Masias v. Director Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00127
Plaintiff: Manuel Masias
Defendant: Director Department of Corrections, Wyoming Honor Conservation Camp Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Wyoming Honor Conservation Camp Warden
as 2:2013cv00018
Petitioner: Donald McDonald
Respondent: Wyoming Honor Conservation Camp Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state detainer)
GIbbs v. Wyoming Honor Conservation Camp Warden et al
as 2:2009cv00165
Petitioner: Kacey Allan Gibbs
Respondent: Wyoming Honor Conservation Camp Warden and Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?