Tercero Rafael v. Easterwood et al
| David Easterwood, Kristi Noem, Pamela Bondi, Todd M. Lyons and Gene Samuelson |
| Luis Felipe Tercero Rafael |
| 4:2026cv03080 |
| March 5, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Brian C Buescher |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Habeas Corpus: Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS - IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner Tercero Rafael's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Filing #1 , is denied. Ordered by Judge Brian C. Buescher. (TCL)
|
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (RJS) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5, receipt number CNEDC-5518534), by Attorney Claire K. Bazata on behalf of Luis Felipe Tercero Rafael (Attachments: #1 Exhibit I-213, #2 Exhibit Order of Immigration Judge Denying Bond, #3 Exhibit Notice to Appear)(Bazata, Claire) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
