Mendenhall v. Astrue
||Lori Ann Mendenhall
||Michael J. Astrue
||Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
||May 20, 2014
||US District Court for the District of Nebraska
||7 North Platte Office
||Thomas D. Thalken
|Nature of Suit:
||Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 12, 2015
ORDER - The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed and the appeal is denied. The Commissioner's Motion to Strike (Filing No. 26 ) is granted. Judgment against the Plaintiff and in favor of the Defendant will be entered in a separate document. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)
|May 20, 2014
ORDER - The plaintiffs Application and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 1 p. 5) is granted; accordingly, the plaintiff shall be allowed to proceed without payment of the filing fee The U.S. Marshal shall serve the summons and Complaint without payment of costs or fees. Service may be by certified mail pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and Nebraska law in the discretion of the U.S. Marshal. 3. To obtain service of process on the defendant, the plaintiff must complete an d return three summons forms and three USM-285 forms. Upon receipt of the completed forms, the Clerk of the court will sign the summons forms, to be forwarded with copies of the Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service of process. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (AOA)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?