Tomlinson v. Astrue
| James E. Tomlinson |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
| 8:2011cv00096 |
| March 16, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 31 Motion for Attorney Fees. Counsel for plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $9,263.75. Counsel for the plaintiff shall refund the previously awarded $5,981.25 directly to the plaintiff to offset the $9,263.75 award. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER granting the Plaintiff's 25 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Social Security Administration is directed to pay the attorney fee in the amount of $5,981.25 directly to the plaintiff, less any offset to satisfy a pre-existing debt to the United States. A judgment for attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of $5,981.25 will be entered this date. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The ALJ's determination is reversed. The court orders this case remanded for proceedings consistent with this decision. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TEL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
