Jenkins v. Astrue
John Jenkins |
Michael J. Astrue |
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
8:2011cv00266 |
August 3, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Lyle E. Strom |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER - Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), plaintiffs counsel is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $9,850.00. Plaintiffs counsel shall refund $6,500.00 to plaintiff. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR) |
Filing 30 ORDER - Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $6,500.00. Plaintiff is awarded reimbursement of the filing fee of $350.00 from the judgment fund administered by the Department of the Treasury. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR) |
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION on the review of the decision of defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Upon review, the court finds the Commissioners decision will be vacated, and this matter remanded for the award of SSD benefits to Mr. Jenkins. A separate order will be entered in accordance with this memorandum opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR) |
Filing 19 ORDER - The motion to Extend 18 is granted. Plaintiff shall have until December 27, 2011, to file his brief. Defendant shall have until January 27, 2012, to file his brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.