Sir Arthur Heim for Citizens Suit v. U.S. Attorney Generals Eric Holder et al
Plaintiff: Sir Arthur Heim for Citizens Suit
Defendant: IRS, Nebraska Attorney General John Brunning, U.S. Attorney Generals Eric Holder, Wyoming Attorney General Greg Philips and Colorado Attorney General John Sutheral
Case Number: 8:2011cv00376
Filed: October 26, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 65 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - As previously ordered, any filing that does not comply with the court's November 20, 2012, Memorandum and Order 57 wil be returned to Plaintiff without filing. The court will continue to maintain a record of Plaintif f's submissions and the return of his submissions in the CM/ECF system under the "PS" designation. This Memorandum and Order serves as notice that the court will no longer forward Plaintiffs materials to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals for filing in his appellate court case (i.e., Plaintiff must mail them himself). The mailing address for the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals is Thomas F. Eagleton Courthouse / Room 24.329 / 111 South 10th Street / St. Louis, MO 63102. The clerks office is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals)(MKR)
January 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 60 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- Plaintiff shall have until February 7, 2013, in which to either pay the $455.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The Clerk of the Court shall not accept further fil ings from Plaintiff in this matter except for an application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (SeeFiling No. [57[.) ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 2/7/2013: Deadline to submit IFP on appeal or pay filing fee.) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party with Form AO240) (MKR)
April 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 44 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendants Motions to Dismiss (filing nos. 23 and 35 ) are granted and Plaintiffs Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. All other pending Motions and Objections are denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
March 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- Plaintiffs Objection to Memorandum and Order (filing no. 37 ) and Motion for Pretrial Hearing (filing no. 38 ) are denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
November 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -Plaintiff is directed to correct the above-listed technical defect in the Complaint on or before December 2, 2011. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240, Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 12/2/2011December 2, 2011: deadline for payment or filing of IFP application.) Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copies mailed as directed) (MKR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sir Arthur Heim for Citizens Suit v. U.S. Attorney Generals Eric Holder et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IRS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nebraska Attorney General John Brunning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Attorney Generals Eric Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wyoming Attorney General Greg Philips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Colorado Attorney General John Sutheral
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sir Arthur Heim for Citizens Suit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?