Evans v. Astrue
| Katrina Evans |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
| 8:2012cv00335 |
| September 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Laurie Smith Camp |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The plaintiff's motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, ECF No. 23 , is granted, and the plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $2,351.52. This amount is to be paid directly to the plaintiff by the Social Security Administration. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom.
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON REVIEW OF THE FINAL DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION- The Commissioner of Social Security's decision is reversed. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If requested to do so, the U.S. Marshal will serve process in this case without prepayment of fees. In making such a request, Plaintiff's counsel must complete the Marshal's Form 285, to be submitted to the Marshal with the completed summons forms and copies of the Complaint. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (ADB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
