Fraction v. Douglas County Attorney's Office et al
Bernard Fraction |
Tim Dolan, Theresia Urich, Richard Kopf, John Ewing, Dennis Rookstool, Douglas County Attorney's Office, Director of Public Properties and Douglas County Treasurer's Office |
8:2019cv00192 |
May 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Pro Se Docket |
Richard G Kopf |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2016-02: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Senior Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Recuse on behalf of Plaintiff Bernard Fraction. (KLF) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Bernard Fraction. (KLF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Douglas County Attorney's Office, Director of Public Properties, Tim Dolan, Douglas County Treasurer's Office, John Ewing, Richard Kopf, Dennis Rookstool, and Theresia Urich filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff Bernard Fraction. (KLF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.