Cases 1 - 10 of 19
The New York Times Company v. United States Department of Justice
as 22-2232
Plaintiff / Appellant:
The New York Times Company and John Ewing, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
Intervenor:
Volkswagen AG
Novodvorschi v. Smith et al
as 7:2021cv00038
Defendant:
James E. Bavousett, Gregory S. Hicks, John Ewing and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Novodvorschi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Fraction v. Douglas County Attorney's Office et al
as 8:2019cv00192
Defendant:
Tim Dolan, Theresia Urich, Richard Kopf and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Fraction
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Ewing v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2018ct03015
Plaintiff:
John Ewing
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Katie M. Blakeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Glover v. West et al
as 7:2016cv00118
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamont Glover
Defendant:
David West, Jose B Uribe, Robert Klusmeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Ewing Company v. 707Ranch, L.L.C.
as 1:2016cv00678
Plaintiff:
John Ewing Company
Defendant:
707Ranch, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Green et al v. City of St. Louis Missouri
as 4:2015cv01433
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri
Plaintiff:
Percy Green, III , Abram Pruitt, Jr. , Harrith RT Ahmad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
New England Life Insurance Company v. Lee et al
as 2:2014cv01797
Defendant:
John Ewing, Charles Hall, Kaizen Consultants, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
New England Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ewing v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 5:2013cv00799
Plaintiff:
John Ewing
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
