Jones et al v. The Hartford Insurance Company et al
| Michael Jones and Debra Jones |
| Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd and The Hartford Insurance Company |
| 8:2019cv00254 |
| June 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Robert F Rossiter |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1330 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
TEXT ORDER granting #15 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. David V. Drew and Kelly Henry Turner are granted leave to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiffs, who remain represented by other counsel. David V. Drew and Kelly Henry Turner shall no longer receive electronic notice in this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Attorney Kelly H. Turner and David V. Drew on behalf of Plaintiffs Debra Jones and Michael Jones. (LKO) |
|
Filing 14
TEXT ORDER granting #13 Unopposed Motion to Extend. The Rule 26(f) Meeting Report deadline is extended to August 14, 2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Extend Time to File Rule 26(f) Report Scheduling Order #8 by Attorney David A. Houghton on behalf of Plaintiffs Debra Jones, Michael Jones.(Houghton, David) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney David A. Houghton on behalf of Plaintiffs Debra Jones, Michael Jones (Houghton, David) |
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. for Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. by Attorney Spencer R. Murphy on behalf of Defendants Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd, The Hartford Insurance Company, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc..(Murphy, Spencer) |
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Spencer R. Murphy on behalf of Defendants Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd, The Hartford Insurance Company.(Murphy, Spencer) |
|
Filing 9
CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (ADB)
|
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 7/24/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (ADB)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Notice of Removal Complaint regarding: Notice of Removal Attorney - Complaint, #1 by Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd, The Hartford Insurance Company (Murphy, Spencer) |
| Filing 6 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant The Hartford Insurance Company. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (LKO) |
| Filing 5 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (LKO) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney Kelly H. Turner has not registered for admittance to practice or registered for the system. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (LKO) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney David V. Drew has not registered for the system or paid the biennial assessment. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (LKO) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against All Plaintiffs from District Court of Washington County, Nebraska, Case number CI 19-0095 ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-3959262) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Spencer R. Murphy on behalf of Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd, The Hartford Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Murphy, Spencer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
