King v. State of Nebraska et al
| Devonte King |
| State of Nebraska, City of Aurora Nebraska, Grent Moody, Reed, Shaathoff and B. Hays |
| 8:2021cv00399 |
| October 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT - PRO SE - Pursuant to the Memorandum and Order entered this date, this case is dismissed in its entirety, with Plaintiff's state-law conversion or replevin claims being dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, and Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. 1983 claims being dismissed as frivolous. (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This case is dismissed in its entirety, with Plaintiff's state-law conversion or replevin claims being dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, and Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. 1983 claims being dismissed as frivolous. Plaintiff is warned that should he file the same case again, remedial action such as sanctions or filing restrictions may be imposed. Judgment will be entered by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting the Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
|
Filing 5
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2020-01: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (MKR) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Devonte King in support of rights violation on behalf of Plaintiff Devonte King.(MKR) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Devonte King. (MKR) Modified on 10/8/2021 to correct event type (MKR). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against City of Aurora Nebraska, B. Hays, Grent Moody, Reed, Shaathoff and State of Nebraska, No Summons issued, filed on behalf of Plaintiff Devonte King. (MKR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
