Knight v. City of Omaha et al
Phyllis M. Knight and Phyllis M. Knight D.M. |
City of Omaha, Judge Sheryl L. Lohaus, Darryl R. Lowe, Derek R. Vaughn, Doug Peterson, Etta Carlisle, Ronald Murtaugh, Ronald Ross, Kenneth Porter, Vincent Tyler, Todd Schmaderer, Ken Kanger, Mathew Rich, Timothy F. Dunning, Brian Parizek, Jon Kramer, Scott E. Kracl, Metropolitan Utilities District, Justin Wayne, Franklin Thompson, Christopher Overton, Jamelle Ross, Vincent Taylor, Eric Eaton, Jean Stothert and Omaha Municipal Land Bank (OMLB) |
8:2022cv00111 |
March 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Pro Se Docket |
Richard G Kopf |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's "emergency motion to correct artifice error in case titling" (Filing 9) is denied in all respects. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL) |
Filing 9 EMERGENCY MOTION to Correct Artifice Error in Case Titling on behalf of Plaintiff Phyllis M. Knight. (LKO) |
Filing 8 JUDGMENT - PRO SE - Pursuant to the court's Memorandum and Order filed this date, JUDGMENT IS ENTERED providing that this case is dismissed without prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that this case is dismissed without prejudice. Judgment shall be entered by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO) |
Filing 6 ORDER - that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in her case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of her claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO) |
Filing 5 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2020-01: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Phyllis M. Knight. (LKO) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET on behalf of Plaintiff Phyllis M. Knight. (LKO) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Etta Carlisle, City of Omaha, Timothy F. Dunning, Eric Eaton, Ken Kanger, Scott E. Kracl, Jon Kramer, Sheryl L. Lohaus, Darryl R. Lowe, Metropolitan Utilities District, Ronald Murtaugh, Omaha Municipal Land Bank (OMLB), Christopher Overton, Brian Parizek, Doug Peterson, Kenneth Porter, Mathew Rich, Jamelle Ross, Ronald Ross, Todd Schmaderer, Jean Stothert, Vincent Taylor, Franklin Thompson, Vincent Tyler, Derek R. Vaughn, and Justin Wayne filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff Phyllis M. Knight. (LKO) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/28/2022: #1 Restricted Attachments) (LKO). (ATTACHMENT MAINTAINED IN CLERK'S OFFICE (1 CD) (ADB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.