Cases 1 - 10 of 10
TAYLOR v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06295
Plaintiff:
VINCENT TAYLOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Knight v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Phyllis M. Knight and Phyllis M. Knight D.M.
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Judge Sheryl L. Lohaus, Darryl R. Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Robinson (Allen)
as 21-1865
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ronald Robinson, AKA Gutta, AKA Peoples, Kenneth McGriff, AKA Supreme, AKA Preme, AKA Rick Coleman, AKA Kevin Long, AKA John Simms, AKA Lee Tuten, Dennis Crosby, AKA Howbout, AKA Divine and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Russell Allen
Sapia et al v. Home Box Office, Inc.
as 1:2019cv03142
Plaintiff:
Neftali Pellot, Gary Phifer, Kendal Brazel and others
Defendant:
Home Box Office, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Sapia et al v. Home Box Office, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01317
Plaintiff:
Michael Sapia , Christian Pellot , Neftali Pellot and others
Defendant:
Home Box Office, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Vincent Taylor et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2015cv02782
Defendant:
Does, National Default Servicing Corporation and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Vincent Taylor
TAYLOR v. Answers Corporation
as 0:2015cv60135
Plaintiff:
VINCENT TAYLOR
Defendant:
Answers Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor (ID 40023) v. Roberts et al
as 5:2013cv03210
Plaintiff:
Vincent Taylor
Defendant:
Ray Roberts, Douglas Waddington, Randy Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ogden et al v. Con Care, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv03190
Plaintiff:
Garrett Jack Ogden, Vincent Taylor, G. D. Blankenship and others
Defendant:
Con Care, Inc., (fnu) Hinshaw and Nola Folston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
