Carlton v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
| Robert Carlton |
| Union Pacific Railroad Co. |
| 8:2023cv00211 |
| May 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Susan M Bazis |
| Brian C Buescher |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent Union Pacific Corporation for Union Pacific Railroad Co.. by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendants Union Pacific Railroad Co., Union Pacific Corporation.(Moore, Scott) |
| Filing 13 REPLY BRIEF Response #10 by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co..(Moore, Scott) |
| Filing 12 MOTION For Oral Argument by Attorney Caitlin L. Opperman on behalf of Plaintiff Robert Carlton.(Opperman, Caitlin) |
| Filing 11 DECLARATION regarding Response #10 by Attorney Caitlin L. Opperman on behalf of Plaintiff Robert Carlton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Plaintiffs Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Class Certification, Harris v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., No. 8:16-cv-381-JFB-SMB (D. Neb.), ECF No. 249, #2 Exhibit 2 - Opening Brief for Appellant Union Pacific Railroad Company, Harris v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., No. 19-1514 (8th Cir. Apr. 25, 2019), #3 Exhibit 3 - Reply Brief for Appellant Union Pacific Railroad Company, Harris v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., No. 19-1514 (8thCir. July 16, 2019))(Opperman, Caitlin) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE regarding MOTION to Dismiss #6 by Attorney Caitlin L. Opperman on behalf of Plaintiff Robert Carlton.(Opperman, Caitlin) |
| Filing 9 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co.. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(TJM) |
| Filing 8 DECLARATION of Scott Parrish Moore in Support of Motion to Dismiss by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co..(Moore, Scott) |
| Filing 7 BRIEF in support of Motion to Dismiss by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co..(Moore, Scott) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co..(Moore, Scott) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co. on 5/25/2023. (Opperman, Caitlin) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (JES) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
| Filing 2 Summons Requested as to Union Pacific Railroad Co. regarding Complaint, #1 . (Opperman, Caitlin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Union Pacific Railroad Co. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4869650), by Attorney Caitlin L. Opperman on behalf of Robert Carlton (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - UP Medical Rules)(Opperman, Caitlin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Carlton v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Carlton | |
| Represented By: | Lucas J. Kaster |
| Represented By: | Caitlin L. Opperman |
| Represented By: | James H. Kaster |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Co. | |
| Represented By: | Scott P. Moore |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
