Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Duffy v. United States Postal Service et al
as 8:2023cv02891
Plaintiff: John T. Duffy
Defendant: US Postal Service, Thomas Magilligan, Robert Carlton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duffy v. Magilligan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv02604
Plaintiff: John Duffy
Defendant: Tom Magilligan, Edward Haab, USPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv00211
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Fayak et al v. Earl et al
as 1:2023cv00486
Plaintiff: Mark Fayak, John E Russell, III, Danny Gordon and others
Defendant: Steven Earl, Robert Carlton, Jennifer Earl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Robert Stiles v. United States
as 23-1382
Petitioner / Appellant: Robert Carlton Stiles
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
Robert Stiles v. United States
as 22-3378
Petitioner / Appellant: Robert Carlton Stiles
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
Robert Stiles v. United States
as 22-2941
Petitioner / Appellant: Robert Carlton Stiles
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
Sarrah Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04959
Plaintiff: Alicia Breeden, Jessica Campbell, Sarrah Adams and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
United States v. Robert Stiles
as 22-2529
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Robert Carlton Stiles, also known as Tynk
Stiles v. USA
as 3:2022cv00115
Petitioner: Robert Carlton Stiles
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?