Johnson v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Kenneth Johnson |
United States Department of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, United States Transportation Security Administration and Gale D. Rossides |
3:2009cv00975 |
August 28, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Binghamton Office |
Broome |
Thomas J. McAvoy |
David E. Peebles |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 DECISION AND ORDER adopting the 59 Report and Recommendations; granting Defendants' 55 Motion for Sanctions; dismissing the Plaintiff's complaint with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 6/27/2011. (amt) [Pltf served via cert. mail] |
Filing 44 DECISION AND ORDER granting Defts' 26 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; Pltf's claims based on marital status, national origin, reduction in hours, inquires whether he wished to be transferred and failure to promote are DISMISSED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 7/12/2010. (amt) [Pltf served via reg. mail] |
Filing 42 DECISION AND ORDER denying Pltf's 33 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 6/23/2010. (amt) [Pltf served via reg. mail] |
Filing 24 DECISION AND ORDER granting Deft Broome County's 20 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 4/13/2010. (amt) [Pltf served via reg. mail] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.