Mosquero v. Graham et al
Juan R. Mosquero and Juan R. Mosquera Bilan |
Matthew Carnell, Langty, J. Fasce, John Doe (1), Michael Polcovich, Jane Doe, G. Steven, R. Lord, Blasdell, Harold D. Graham, Short, J. Giambrone, Smith, K. Raymond, John Doe (2), John Doe (3), Hopper and Hooper |
9:2019cv00442 |
April 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Andrew T Baxter |
Glenn T Suddaby |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Juan R. Mosquero. (Attachments: #1 exhibits part 1 of 2, #2 exhibits part 2 of 2, #3 affidavit of service, #4 envelope)(nas, ) |
Filing 10 Letter Motion from Juan R. Mosquero requesting to add defendants. (nas, ) |
Filing 9 Letter Motion from Juan R. Mosquero requesting an additional fifteen days to file an amended complaint. (nas, ) |
Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #5 Letter Request. Plaintiff is granted an extension of time to submit his amended complaint in compliance with this Court's Decision and Order of 5/2/19 until 7/8/2019. Authorized by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 5/29/19. {text order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, ) |
Filing 7 Copy of dkt. no. #5 Letter Motion by Juan R. Mosquero. (nas, ) |
Filing 6 Copy of #5 Letter Motion requesting an extension of time to submit an amended complaint by Juan R. Mosquero with notation of 5/21/19. (nas, ) |
Filing 5 Letter Motion dated 5/24/19 from Juan R. Mosquero requesting an extension of time to submit an amended complaint. (nas, ) |
Filing 4 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted. ORDERED that if Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, he must file an Amended Complaint as set forth above within thirty (30) days from the date of the filing of this Decision and Order. ORDERED that, if Plaintiff timely files an Amended Complaint, this matter be returned to the Court for further review. ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to timely file an Amended Complaint as directed, the Clerk shall enter judgment indicating that the remainder of this action is DISMISSED without prejudice without further order of this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and for failure to comply with this Decision and Order. In that event, the Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 5/2/19. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas) |
Notification to Superintendent of Filing - Provided Superintendent at Sing Sing Correctional Facility with notice of instant action and a copy of Plaintiff's #3 Inmate Authorization Form. USDC/NYND Finance Dept notified. (rar, ) |
Filing 3 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Juan R. Mosquero. (rar, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Juan R. Mosquero. (Attachments: #1 IFP) (rar) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Blasdell, Matthew Carnell, Jane Doe, John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3), J. Fasce, J. Giambrone, Harold D. Graham, Hopper, Langty, R. Lord, Michael Polcovich, K. Raymond, Short, Smith, G. Steven filed by Juan R. Mosquero. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 cover letter, #3 Letter dated April 10, 2019 re: sending complaint to WDNY on April 3, 2019, #4 envelope)(rar, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.