Burrell v. Central New York Psychiatric Center et al
Ako K. Burrell |
Central New York Psychiatric Center, D. McIntosh, C. Webb, A. Frenya, W. LeClair, Liberty, Rodier, Carrow, T. Cashway, E. Holland, Kinter, Wilson, Whitehurst, Rogers, J. Cavelly, Belair, Clevland, Jane Doe, DeCoteau, Corrow, T. Lashway and J. Lavelly |
9:2022cv00344 |
April 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Andrew T Baxter |
Gary L Sharpe |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Ako K. Burrell. (Attachments: #1 Mailing envelope) (meb) |
Filing 4 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM filed by Ako K. Burrell. (meb) |
Filing 3 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM filed by Ako K. Burrell. (meb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ako K. Burrell.(meb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Belair, Carrow, T. Cashway, J. Cavelly, Central New York Psychiatric Center, Clevland, DeCoteau, Jane Doe, A. Frenya, E. Holland, Kinter, W. LeClair, Liberty, D. McIntosh, Rodier, Rogers, C. Webb, Whitehurst, Wilson filed by Ako K. Burrell. (Attachments: #1 Mailing envelope)(meb) (Main Document 1 replaced on 4/12/2022 with a version that has the pages correctly oriented) (meb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.