collins v. Astrue
Plaintiff: eric collins
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2009cv00797
Filed: October 30, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: LAWRENCE
Presiding Judge: Susan J. Dlott
Presiding Judge: Timothy S Hogan
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 425 Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 17 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, defendant's decision is found to be supported by substantial evidence, and is AFFIRMED. This case is TERMINATED from the docket of this Court. Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott. (wam1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: collins v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: eric collins
Represented By: Maria T Goldcamp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?