Howard v. United States of America Railroad Retirment Board et al
| Millie Howard |
| United States of America Railroad Retirment Board, United States Department of Justice and United States Attorney General |
| 1:2015cv00679 |
| October 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| CLERMONT |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 151 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Magistrate Judge's June 6, 2016 R&R (Doc. 19) is ADOPTED. It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 6 ) is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Default J udgment (Doc. 8 ) is DENIED as MOOT; 3. Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer (Doc. 15 ) is DENIED and MOOT; 4. Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17 ) is DENIED as MOOT; 5. Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate the R&R in its Entirety as Doc #:[1 9] on 06/06/16, Pages 1-10 and In the Interest of Justice that this Cause of Action be Transferred to the United States Court of Federal Claims (Doc. 20 ) is DENIED; and 6. This matter shall be CLOSED and TERMINATED from the active docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/15/2016. (jee)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
