Malone v. Conley et al
Marlowe Malone |
Conley, John Doe and Jane Doe |
1:2017cv00413 |
June 16, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
SCIOTO |
Timothy S. Black |
Karen L. Litkovitz |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 DECISION AND ENTRY adopting the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 44 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 3/10/2020. (rrs)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 24 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 21 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 7/31/18. (jlm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendant Conley's 9 MOTION TO DISMISS be Denied, and that defendant Conley be granted an extension of time until (20) days after any Order adopting this R&R to file a responsive pleading, and that plaintiff 39;s 16 MOTION to amend the complaint be Denied. Objections to R&R due by 4/16/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 4/2/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.