Cases 1 - 10 of 2,436
Conley
as 2:2024cv06235
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Plaintiff:
Janalyn C. Conley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Jackson v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv50314
Defendant:
Aroyal, Raviden, Tarry Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jelnek et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran,
as 1:2024cv05520
Plaintiff:
Ashten Moss, Sunny Chiang, Devonte Carter and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran,
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01257
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Conley v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02929
Plaintiff:
Michael Conley
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00442
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dixon et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00869
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Dixon, Robert Alexander, Kevin Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Lutman v. Conley et al
as 1:2024cv02914
Plaintiff:
Michael Norris Lutman
Defendant:
Robert Conley, PHH Mortgage Corporation, Thomas Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Farris v. Bennett et al
as 4:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Farris
Defendant:
Lt. Adam Bennett, Sgt. Julie Poirier, Sgt. Heather Conley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Rodney Conley
as 24-3552
Petitioner:
In re: RODNEY M. CONLEY
Respondent:
DOUGLAS LUNEKE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
