Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Lewis v. Lewis, et al.
as 4:2024cv00773
Defendant:
Karen Lewis, Richard Scott Woodruff, MCKINNEY 380 TD2, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conley v. Dennard et al
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Natalie Conley
Defendant:
Brad Dennard, Michael DeWyre, Patty Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Conley v. Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Tiara Conley
Defendant:
Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company
Other:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Conley v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00850
Petitioner:
David Ray Conley, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conley v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00867
Petitioner:
David Ray Conley, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conley v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00833
Petitioner:
David Ray Conley, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conley v. Wright et al
as 4:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Sterling Conley
Defendant:
Mary Francis Hurt Conley Wright, BMI Records, et al, Welk Music and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Texas Tribune et al v. Caldwell County, Texas et al
as 1:2023cv00910
Plaintiff:
Texas Tribune, Mano Amiga and Caldwell/Hays Examiner
Defendant:
Caldwell County, Texas, Trey Hicks, Matt Kiely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pena v. Goudreaux et al
as 5:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Martin Pena, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer FNU Goudreaux, Officer FNU Estrada, E. Fuentes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laster v. Hubbard et al
as 4:2022cv02337
Plaintiff:
Vanthony Laster
Defendant:
Antonio Hubbard and Timothy Conley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
