Cases 1 - 10 of 21
GREGORY v. CONLEY
as 1:2020cv02764
Plaintiff:
DEAN GREGORY
Defendant:
LINDSEY CONLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CONLEY v. USA
as 1:2020cv01681
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ANTWAUN LA DANIEL CONLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CONLEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv01065
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
BETTY S. CONLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONLEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv02833
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY CONLEY
Defendant:
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION TO ENFORCE AN ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENA et al v. CONLEY
as 1:2016mc02158
Petitioner:
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Respondent:
BRIAN E. CONLEY
Cause Of Action: MS:MiscOrd
CONLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv01155
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROWLAND CONLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES C. FOX, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv01359
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROWLAND CONLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES C. FOX, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2014cv01177
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, JIM BRENAN, JOY FLOWERS CONTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CONLEY v. AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION
as 1:2013cv00957
Plaintiff:
YVETTE CONLEY
Defendant:
AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
ITPE PENSION FUND et al v. STRONGHOLD SECURITY, LLC
as 1:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
ITPE PENSION FUND , DENNIS R. ARRINGTON , JERRY M. BOWDEN and others
Defendant:
STRONGHOLD SECURITY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
