Bloodworth v. Doe et al
| Phillip J. Bloodworth |
| John Doe, Erdos, Mahlman, Warren, Memmert, Setty, McCroskey, Cooper, Shoemaker and Eddy |
| 1:2017cv00450 |
| June 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| SCIOTO |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER overruling as moot 12 Objections and overruling 16 and 22 Objections and adopting Report and Recommendations re 9 , 14 and 18 Report and Recommendations denying 15 Motion to Appoint Counsel, denying 20 Motion for Waiver, denying 21 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/17/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 18 Report and Recommendation denying 17 Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/5/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
18
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 17 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint 17 should be DENIED because the proposed second ame nded complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Objections to R&R due by 8/30/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 8/16/2018. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
9
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that for the foregoing reasons a n appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 09/19/2017. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
