McDougald v. Erdos et al
Jerone McDougald |
Ron Erdos, Teresa Hill, Ms. Williams, Janis Reiter, Lt. Humphrey and William Cool |
1:2017cv00464 |
July 10, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
SCIOTO |
Michael R. Barrett |
Stephanie K. Bowman |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 40 47 Report and Recommendations denying 41 Motion for Extension of Time to File; denying 41 Motion to Amend/Correct and denying 38 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 4/19/19. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/19/2019: # 1 Corrected Order) (ba). |
Filing 34 ORDER: The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations (Doc 25 ) is ADOPTED and the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 20 ) is GRANTED; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Initial Compl aint (Doc. 10 ) is DENIED AS MOOT; the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend hisAmended Complaint (Doc. 27 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff shall not file any additional documents with the Court regarding his Amended Complaint; and the Plaintiff 39;s Motion to Amend Objections to the R&R (Doc. 33 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff shall not file any additional documents with the Court regarding his Amended Objections. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/25/2018. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 20 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint, 10 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Original Complaint. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the motion of Defendants to dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 20 be GRANTED, and that this case be dismissed. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED THAT the motion of Defendants to dismiss the original complaint 10 be DENIED AS MOOT. Objections to R&R due by 6/8/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 5/25/2018. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.