Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Roby v. MDOC et al
as 4:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Oscar Roby
Defendant:
MDOC, MS William and MS Shorts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Vancey et al
as 5:2023ct03346
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
D. Vancey, Jason Farmer, Ms. Whittaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bro Michael El-Bey v. Shannon Avery
as 23-1737
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRO STEPHEN MICHAEL EL-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SHANNON E. AVERY, Covet Administrator, RAYNARDO GOMEZ, DAVID M. BROWN and others
Joseph Allen v. Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-10945
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH WAYNE ALLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MS WILLIAMS, ARPN, UNKNOWN TRANSPORTATION OFFICER #1 and others
Ward v. McDonald et al
as 2:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward
Defendant:
Mr. McDonald and Ms. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Sergeant Hafeez
as 23-6042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT HAFEEZ, SERGEANT HUNT, OFFICER BARNES and others
Demetrius Glenn v. Adam Ruffin
as 23-6034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMETRIUS GLENN
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM RUFFIN, Attorney, MICHAEL HENTHORNE, Attorney, MS. WILLIAMS, Lt SCDC and others
Wilson v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2022cv00727
Plaintiff:
Antoine L. Wilson
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, Davis, P. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. GERNEGEN et al
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. BALRUS PERRIGAN GERNEGEN, MARCUS SCOTT, CAPTAIN MR. INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karavias v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Jason S Karavias, II
Defendant:
J. Johnson and Ms. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
