Lin v. United States Attorney General et al
| Yong Lin |
| Acting DHS Secretary and United States Attorney General |
| 1:2019cv00731 |
| September 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Timothy S Black |
| Karen L Litkovitz |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by William Bryan King, II for Defendants Acting DHS Secretary, United States Attorney General (King, William) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Acting DHS Secretary, United States Attorney General, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and sent to the marshal for service(jlw) Modified on 9/9/2019 (jlw). |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Acting DHS Secretary, United States Attorney General, filed by Yong Lin. (jlw) |
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and that the United States Marshal serve a copy of the complaint, summons and this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/7/2019. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff Yong Lin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summons Form) (cb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
