Mamedova et al v. USCIS et al
Samuel Levy, Gulara I Mamedova and Samuel L. Levy, Jr. |
Acting Director DHS Chad Wolf, USCIS, Board of Immigration Appeals, Julie Decker, Senior Official perf Kenneth T Cuccinelli, William Barr, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, United States Attorney General and Cincinnati Field Office Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
1:2020cv00972 |
December 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Matthew W McFarland |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (kl) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant United States Attorney General. (kl) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Board of Immigration Appeals. Board of Immigration Appeals served on 12/15/2020, answer due 2/16/2021. (kh) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed (Not Effectuated related to COVID19) as to AUSA Southern District of Ohio, Civil Process Clerk, Joseph P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse. Defendants Board of Immigration Appeals, Cincinnati Field Office Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, United States Attorney General, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (kl) (kl) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Joseph Horwitz for Defendants Board of Immigration Appeals, Cincinnati Field Office Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, United States Attorney General, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Horwitz, Matthew) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed (Not Effectuated related to COVID19) as to Defendant Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (kl) |
Filing 3 Certificate of Mailing: Certified mailing of summons and complaint through the Clerk's Office pursuant to Local Rule 4.2. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt) (bjc) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Board of Immigration Appeals, Cincinnati Field Office Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, United States Attorney General, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, and U.S. Attorney. (eh) |
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (eh) Modified docket text on 12/4/2020 (kh). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against William Barr, Board of Immigration Appeals, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, Julie Decker, USCIS, Chad Wolf ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-7811916), filed by Samuel Levy, Gulara I Mamedova. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit I-130 Approval, #2 Exhibit Notice of Intent to Revoke, #3 Exhibit Response to Notice of Revoke, #4 Exhibit I-130 Revocation, #5 Exhibit BIA Decision, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Summons Form AUSA, #8 Summons Form BIA, #9 Summons Form Chad Wolf, #10 Summons Form Julie Decker, #11 Summons Form Kenneth Cuccinelli, #12 Summons Form USCIS, #13 Summons Form William Barr) (Bratton, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.